United States v. Crockett, 435 F. 3d 1305 (10th Cir. 2006) is a case involving a prosecution for tax fraud. The trial judge refused to allow cross-examination of a witness about the tax advice she received from a third party. The prosecution objected that the cross-examination was beyond the scope of the direct examination.
Because the defense failed to reveal the content of the evidence he expected to adduce, the Court reviewed the ruling for plain error and found none.
GREGORY CHANDLER, Attorney at Law
No comments:
Post a Comment